Back to blog
Rental Business

Fashion Rental and Resale: US/UK Retailers Accelerate

Rental + second-hand booming? ZIQY scales recommerce and manages multi-status inventory, with 23% growth in 2024. Start now.

13 min read
Fashion Rental and Resale: US/UK Retailers Accelerate

Fashion Rental and Resale: US/UK Retailers Accelerate

Retail Transformation

The 2024 holiday season marks a historic turning point in Anglo-Saxon fashion retail.

Nordstrom, ASOS, John Lewis, and Urban Outfitters are massively deploying their rental and resale programs, transforming their traditional business models into true circular ecosystems.

This expansion isn't merely a trend. The clothing rental market surged by +23% in 2024 according to ThredUp's Resale Report.

It reached $2.3 billion in the United States and £890 million in the United Kingdom.

Market Key Figures

2024 Rental Growth: +23% (ThredUp's Resale Report) • US Market: $2.3 billion • UK Market: £890 million • Leading Retailers: Nordstrom, ASOS, John Lewis, Urban Outfitters

The Challenge of Transformation Without Infrastructure

Infrastructure Challenge

Retail giants face a complex equation: how to integrate the circular economy without disrupting their existing operations?

Major infrastructure challenges

Most of these retailers possess neither the specialized logistics infrastructure nor the technological expertise to manage new circular flows.

Four critical areas require complete transformation:

  • Product traceability: authentication, condition, complete history
  • Industrial cleaning and refurbishment cycles: high-volume specialized processes
  • Multi-status inventory management: new/used/rental in real-time
  • Integrated omnichannel customer experience: unified cross-channel journey

The Internalization Trap

78% of retailers who internalize their circular programs abandon them within 18 months, according to a McKinsey 2024 study. Hidden costs and operational complexity rapidly explode.

Impact on existing operations

This transformation affects all company departments. IT teams must manage complex data flows between legacy systems and new circular platforms.

Logistics teams face unprecedented reverse processes: returns, quality assessment, refurbishment, restocking.

Customer service must master new journeys: temporary rental, conditional buyback, extended warranties.

Post-Pandemic Acceleration

New consumer behaviors

The health crisis redefined consumer expectations. The 25-40 age group now prioritizes access over ownership, particularly for three specific categories:

  • Occasion pieces: events, parties, ceremonies
  • Premium inaccessible items: temporary luxury without financial commitment
  • Style experimentation: testing new trends without risk

This behavioral evolution is accompanied by reinforced ecological awareness. 67% of millennials declare they prioritize brands committed to sustainability.

European regulatory pressure

This demand coincides with new European regulations. The AGEC law in France imposes binding reuse quotas.

Future Digital Product Passport (DPP) obligations push brands toward more transparency and circularity.

Key regulatory calendar:

  • 2024: AGEC law reinforcement (10% reuse quotas)
  • 2026: European DPP implementation
  • 2027: Extended textile traceability obligations

Market Opportunity

Retailers launching their circular programs before end of 2024 capture on average +15% new customers in the 25-35 age bracket, according to Euromonitor.

Analysis Roadmap

This transformation raises major strategic questions that we will analyze in the following sections:

Central strategic questions

Operational challenges: How do major retailers overcome logistical and technological challenges of circularity?

Partnership strategies: Why do they favor external solutions rather than internalization?

Technological innovation: What tools enable efficient management of multi-status inventory and product traceability?

Analysis objectives

Return on investment: How to measure the profitability of these new hybrid models?

Emerging solutions: Which technological platforms facilitate this transition to the circular economy?

The objective: decode winning strategies and identify acceleration levers for French and European retailers who aim to follow this path.

Strategic stakes of circularity for retailers

Strategic Stakes

Regulatory and CSR pressure: the noose tightens

Binding legal obligations

European regulation radically transforms the retail landscape with binding obligations. The AGEC law in France has imposed a 10% reuse rate for textiles since 2022.

The European Digital Product Passport will come into force in 2026. This regulation will require complete traceability of each textile product.

Heavy financial sanctions

Retailers face heavy financial sanctions: up to €15,000 fine per infringement for non-compliance with traceability obligations.

This regulatory pressure pushes retailers to natively integrate circularity into their business model.

The regulatory trap to avoid

Many retailers underestimate DPP implementation delays. Traceability systems require a minimum of 18-24 months for deployment.

Massive investments by leaders

Major retailers like H&M or Zara are investing massively: €2.1 billion collectively over 3 years to develop their second-hand and rental platforms.

These investments cover:

  • Logistics infrastructure: sorting and refurbishment centers
  • Traceability technologies: blockchain, IoT, authentication AI
  • Team training: new circular skills
  • Marketing and communication: consumer awareness

New consumer expectations: the circular generation

Demographic profile and purchasing power

Millennials and Gen Z now represent 67% of fashion buyers and carry radically different requirements.

According to the McKinsey 2024 study, 73% of 18-35 year-olds are willing to pay 15% more for sustainable options.

Second-hand market explosion

The second-hand market is exploding with 127% growth over 5 years, reaching $177 billion in 2024.

This demand creates new segmented business opportunities:

  • Rental: +45% annual growth (Rent the Runway, By Rotation)
  • Resale: market valued at $350 billion by 2028
  • Repair: premium service with 40-60% margins

Key consumer insight

Gen Z prioritizes access over possession: 68% prefer to rent premium pieces rather than buy them (Vestiaire Collective 2024 study).

Evolving purchase motivations

Purchase motivations evolve toward extra-financial criteria:

  • Environmental impact: carbon footprint reduction
  • Originality: access to unique/vintage pieces
  • Flexibility: adaptation to style changes
  • Experience: discovering new brands

Margin and inventory optimization: the winning equation

Fashion retail profitability revolution

Circularity revolutionizes fashion retail profitability. Unsold items traditionally represent 20-30% of stock, representing billions in annual losses.

The circular model transforms this net loss into additional revenue sources.

Business MetricTraditional ModelCircular ModelImprovement
Unsold rate25-30%8-12%-60% to -75%
Gross margin50-60%65-75%+15 to +25%
Stock turnover4-6x/year8-12x/year+100% to +200%
Revenue/product1x3-5x (rental/resale)+200% to +400%

Product lifetime value optimization

Circular retailers optimize their product lifetime value by multiplying usage cycles. A dress bought for €100 can generate staggered revenues:

Optimized revenue cycle:

  • Rental: €15-25 per use (8-10 rentals/year) = €120-250
  • Resale: €40-60 after 6 months of use
  • Repair: €15-20 service margin per intervention

Key takeaway

Circularity transforms a cost (unsold items) into a profit center. Industry leaders achieve EBITDA margins 8-12 points higher than their traditional competitors.

Decisive competitive advantage

This strategic transformation positions circularity no longer as a CSR constraint, but as a decisive competitive advantage in a saturated market.

Circular retailers benefit from:

  • Strong differentiation: unique market positioning
  • Enhanced loyalty: emotional customer engagement
  • Economic resilience: diversified revenue sources
  • Regulatory anticipation: native compliance with future obligations

Emerging business models: rental vs resale

Business Models

The circular economy in fashion is structured around three distinct business models, each responding to specific needs and generating differentiated margins.

American and British retailers are massively experimenting with these approaches to capture the growing demand for responsible consumption. It now represents 27% of purchase intentions according to ThredUp's Resale Report 2024.

Event and occasion rental

Market positioning and target

The rental model primarily targets special occasions with attractive entry prices. Rent the Runway dominates this segment with 145,000 active subscribers and an average basket of $89 per rental.

This approach responds to a precise need: temporarily accessing premium pieces for one-off events.

Cost structure and profitability

Profitability relies on a high turnover rate: each piece must be rented at least 8 times per year to reach break-even.

Hidden costs of the rental model:

  • Professional cleaning: $12-15 per piece
  • Product insurance: 3-5% of annual purchase price
  • Reverse logistics: collection, sorting, refurbishment
  • Accelerated depreciation: wear linked to frequent rotations

Rental model optimization

High-performing retailers maintain a stock/demand ratio of 1:3 and invest massively in algorithmic prediction of seasonal peaks to avoid stockouts.

Business model comparison

CriteriaRentalResaleTrade-in
Gross margin65-75%15-25%40-50%
Stock turnover8-12x/year2-4x/year6-8x/year
Acquisition costHighLowMedium
Initial investmentVery highLowMedium
Operational complexityVery highLowMedium

Integrated second-hand marketplace

Commission-based business model

Platforms like Vestiaire Collective generate revenue via 15-25% commissions on each transaction. Their operational costs are reduced because sellers manage the initial inventory.

This approach enables rapid scalability without massive stock investment.

Critical operational challenges

The major challenge remains authentication: Vestiaire invests €8M annually in its expertise center to avoid counterfeits.

This barrier to entry protects established players but slows adoption by traditional retailers.

Hidden costs of authentication:

  • Human expertise: specialized authenticators by brand
  • Verification technologies: AI, blockchain, NFC chips
  • Quality assurance: guarantees and refunds
  • Centralized logistics: regional control centers

The disintermediation trap

Integrated marketplaces risk seeing their sellers migrate to dedicated platforms offering better conditions. Retention requires constant value-added services.

Partnership strategies

Performing retailers like Selfridges (Vestiaire partnership) capture 12% additional revenue without stock investment.

But they sacrifice control of the customer experience and direct relationship with end consumers.

Buyback and trade-in programs

Patagonia Worn Wear model

Patagonia Worn Wear perfectly illustrates this model with 30% annual growth on buybacks. The program generates a 45% margin on refurbished pieces, sold at 60-70% of new price.

This approach relies on strong brand image and an engaged community.

Competitive advantage: loyalty

The competitive advantage lies in customer loyalty: trade-in participants spend 40% more on new products according to an internal Patagonia study.

The program functions as a virtuous circle:

  • BuybackStore creditNew purchaseEnhanced loyalty

Complete cost structure

Costs include several often underestimated items:

  • Quality assessment: technical expertise by product category
  • Refurbishment: cleaning, minor repairs, repackaging
  • Extended warranty: specialized after-sales service for used products
  • Specialized marketing: differentiated communication vs new products

VP Sustainability, Patagonia

Buyback programs transform our customers into circularity ambassadors. Each transaction reinforces brand engagement.

Success conditions

Only retailers with strong brand image can justify attractive buyback prices. Credibility and trust are essential.

Key takeaway

Trade-in functions as a loyalty lever as much as a business model. The objective isn't direct profitability but increasing customer lifetime value.

Cross-channel synergies

Success of these models depends on technological integration and ability to create synergies between traditional and circular channels.

Leading retailers develop unified customer journeys where purchase, rental, and resale naturally complement each other.

White-label technologies: the time-to-market accelerator

White Label Tech

SaaS solutions vs internal development

The time-cost-risk equation

Technological choice constitutes the determining factor for circular service launch success. American and British retailers have understood this: 87% of retailers that launched their rental/resale offer in 2023 opted for a white-label solution rather than proprietary development.

The time-to-market difference is spectacular. Where internal development requires 18 to 24 months, a SaaS solution enables launch in 6 to 8 months maximum.

Detailed approach comparison

CriteriaInternal DevelopmentWhite-label SolutionAdvantage
Time-to-market18-24 months6-8 months-66% delay
Initial cost€500K - €2M€50K - €200K-75% investment
Dedicated team8-12 developers2-3 integrators-70% resources
Maintenance20-30% of annual budgetIncluded in subscriptionPredictable cost
ScalabilityLimited to internal resourcesBenefits from shared R&DContinuous innovation

Expert Advice

Prioritize SaaS solutions with API-first architecture. They allow advanced customization while maintaining white-label advantages: automatic updates, regulatory compliance (AGEC), and immediate scalability.

Internal development risks

Proprietary development exposes retailers to major risks:

  • Budget overruns: 73% of projects exceed their initial budget by +40%
  • Delivery delays: average delays extended by 8 months
  • Technological obsolescence: outdated technologies before launch
  • Complex maintenance: hidden support and evolution costs

Integration with existing e-commerce ecosystem

Interoperability challenges

Interoperability represents the major challenge. Retailers already have a complex technology stack: ERP (SAP, Oracle), WMS (Manhattan, Blue Yonder), CRM (Salesforce, Adobe), and e-commerce platforms (Shopify Plus, Magento).

Each system has its own data formats, APIs, and technical constraints.

Pre-configured connectors

Modern white-label solutions offer pre-configured connectors for major platforms. This approach drastically reduces integration risks and custom development costs.

Critical integration points:

  • Inventory synchronization: real-time between new and circular stock
  • Unified customer journey management: purchase → rental → buyback
  • Consolidated reporting: unified cross-channel business management
  • GDPR/CCPA compliance: automation on customer data

The Trap to Avoid

Never underestimate integration complexity with legacy systems. Even with pre-configured connectors, plan 3-4 months of testing and adjustments for robust integration.

Recommended technical architecture

Optimal architecture relies on a microservices approach with centralized API Gateway:

  • Abstraction layer: API Gateway unifying access
  • Business services: rental, resale, authentication, logistics
  • Specialized connectors: ERP, WMS, CRM, e-commerce
  • Centralized Data Lake: cross-system data consolidation

This architecture guarantees the flexibility and scalability necessary for business needs evolution.

Tags
#location#revente#retailers#introduction#enjeux#stratgiques#modles#conomiques

Ready to transform your business model?

Join the leaders of the circular economy. Start your free trial today and discover the power of ZIQY.